<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CYBARIS®</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris</link>
	<description>An Intellectual Property Law Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:49:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Survey of the Legal Landscape Facing Entities with Patents Reciting a Method of Using a Medical Device, by Rigel Menard</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1557</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1557#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>olajumoke.kassim@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4 Issue 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical devices method of use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rigel Menard &#8211; A Survey of the Legal Landscape Facing Entities with Patents Reciting a Method of Using a Medical Device from Cybaris on Vimeo. Executive Editor Jumi Kassim sits down with Rigel Menard to discuss his article: A Survey of the Legal Landscape Facing Entities with Patents Reciting a Method of Using a Medical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/61319266?badge=0" width="500" height="333" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/61319266/">Rigel Menard &#8211; A Survey of the Legal Landscape Facing Entities with Patents Reciting a Method of Using a Medical Device</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user6990033">Cybaris</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p>Executive Editor Jumi Kassim sits down with Rigel Menard to discuss his article: A Survey of the Legal Landscape Facing Entities with Patents Reciting a Method of Using a Medical Device in Volume 4 Issue 1 of Cybaris®, An Intellectual Property Law Review</p>
<p>Click here for PDF: <a href='http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Menard-Patents-Reciting-a-Method-of-Using-a-Medical-Device.pdf'>A Survey of the Legal Landscape Facing Entities with Patents Reciting a Method of Using a Medical Device by Rigel Menard</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1557</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast Episode 01 &#8211; Patent Law Pro Bono: A Best Practices Handbook</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1543</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1543#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>olajumoke.kassim@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4 Issue 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro bono]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Episode 01 &#8211; Volume 4 Issue 1 &#8211; Amy Salmela and Mark Privratsky Patent Law Pro Bono In the first episode of the Cybaris Podcast, Jumi chats with Amy Salmela and Mark Privratsky about their pro bono patent prosecution handbook. The full video of the interview, including a link to the handbook itself and a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Episode-01-Volume-4-Issue-1-Amy-Salmela-and-Mark-Privratsky-Patent-Law-Pro-Bono-small.mp3">Episode 01 &#8211; Volume 4 Issue 1 &#8211; Amy Salmela and Mark Privratsky Patent Law Pro Bono</a></p>
<p>In the first episode of the Cybaris Podcast, Jumi chats with Amy Salmela and Mark Privratsky about their pro bono patent prosecution handbook.</p>
<p>The full video of the interview, including a link to the handbook itself and a place to leave comments, is at <a title="Patent Law Pro Bono: A Best Practices Handbook, by Amy M. Salmela and Mark R. Privratsky" href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1407" target="_blank">the article&#8217;s page here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1543</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Episode-01-Volume-4-Issue-1-Amy-Salmela-and-Mark-Privratsky-Patent-Law-Pro-Bono-small.mp3" length="15005418" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Statutory Construction and Policy Arguments for a Symmetric Approach to Promulgating Guidelines for New Section 102(b) Subparagraphs (A) and (B) – the First-to-Publish Grace Period Exceptions to Prior Art by Brad Pedersen and Christian Hansen</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1534</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1534#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>olajumoke.kassim@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4 Issue 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america invents act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click the link below to download the PDF: Statutory Construction and Policy Arguments for a Symmetric approach to Promulgating Guidelines for New Section 102(b) Subparagraphs (A) and (B) – the First-to-Publish Grace Period Exceptions to Prior Art]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click the link below to download the PDF:</p>
<p><a href='http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Pedersen-Hansen-FTP-Grace-Period.pdf'>Statutory Construction and Policy Arguments for a Symmetric approach to Promulgating Guidelines for New Section 102(b) Subparagraphs (A) and (B) – the First-to-Publish Grace Period Exceptions to Prior Art</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1534</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twenty-First Century Trademarks: How Quirky Quick Response Codes (QUIRCS) Will Challenge the Lanham Act and the USPTO</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1523</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1523#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 01:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joseph.martyn@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3 Issue 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew C. Kulseth discusses Twenty-First Century Trademarks: How Quirky Quick Response Codes (QUIRCS) Will Challenge the Lanham Act and the USPTO]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/49178948?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p>
<p>Matthew C. Kulseth discusses <a title="Twenty-First Century Trademarks: How Quirky Quick Response Codes (QUIRCS) Will Challenge the Lanham Act and the USPTO" href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Kulseth.pdf" target="_blank">Twenty-First Century Trademarks: How Quirky Quick Response Codes (QUIRCS) Will Challenge the Lanham Act and the USPTO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1523</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note: Should the P.R.C. Favor Software and Business Method Patents?</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1519</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1519#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joseph.martyn@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3 Issue 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[X. Christina Huang discusses Note: Should the P.R.C. Favor Software and Business Method Patents?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/53093859?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p>
<p>X. Christina Huang discusses <a title="Note: Should the P.R.C. Favor Software and Business Method Patents?" href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Huang.pdf" target="_blank">Note: Should the P.R.C. Favor Software and Business Method Patents?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1519</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note: The Past, Present, and Future of South Africa’s Patent System by James T. Pechacek</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1511</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1511#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joseph.martyn@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Volume 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James T. Pechacek discusses Note: The Past, Present, and Future of South Africa’s Patent System. &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/48460415?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p>
<p>James T. Pechacek discusses <a href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Pechacek.pdf">Note: The Past, Present, and Future of South Africa’s Patent System</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1511</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note: Identifying Indicia of Extortion in Patent Troll Cases: Eon-Net Lp V. Flagstar Bancorp (2011 U.S. App. Lexis 15650) (Fed. Cir. 2011) by Lucas Hjelle</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1509</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1509#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joseph.martyn@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3 Issue 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucas Hjelle discusses Note: Identifying Indicia of Extortion in Patent Troll Cases: Eon-Net Lp V. Flagstar Bancorp (2011 U.S. App. Lexis 15650) (Fed. Cir. 2011). &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/47455148?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p>
<p>Lucas Hjelle discusses <a href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Hjelle.pdf">Note: Identifying Indicia of Extortion in Patent Troll Cases: Eon-Net Lp V. Flagstar Bancorp (2011 U.S. App. Lexis 15650) (Fed. Cir. 2011)</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1509</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note: What Do We Do Now? How the Elimination of the Best Mode Requirement Minimizes Adequate Disclosure and Creates A Potentially Unenforceable Fact Pattern by Lucas V. Greder</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1499</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1499#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joseph.martyn@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3 Issue 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucas V. Greder discusses Note: What Do We Do Now? How the Elimination of the Best Mode Requirement Minimizes Adequate Disclosure and Creates A Potentially Unenforceable Fact Pattern]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/48037233?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p>
<p>Lucas V. Greder discusses <a title="Note: What Do We Do Now? How the Elimination of the Best Mode Requirement Minimizes Adequate Disclosure and Creates A Potentially Unenforceable Fact Pattern" href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Greder.pdf" target="_blank">Note: What Do We Do Now? How the Elimination of the Best Mode Requirement Minimizes Adequate Disclosure and Creates A Potentially Unenforceable Fact Pattern</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1499</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twenty-First Century Trademarks: How Quirky Quick Response Codes (QUIRCS) Will Challenge the Lanham Act and the USPTO by Matthew C. Kulseth</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1443</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1443#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joseph.martyn@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3 Issue 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PDF: Twenty-First Century Trademarks: How Quirky Quick Response Codes (QUIRCS) Will Challenge the Lanham Act and the USPTO by Matthew C. Kulseth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/49178948?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p>
<p>PDF: <a title="Twenty-First Century Trademarks: How Quirky Quick Response Codes (QUIRCS) Will Challenge the Lanham Act and the USPTO" href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Kulseth.pdf" target="_blank">Twenty-First Century Trademarks: How Quirky Quick Response Codes (QUIRCS) Will Challenge the Lanham Act and the USPTO by Matthew C. Kulseth</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1443</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Usefulness Varies By Country: The Utility Requirement of Patent Law in the United States, Europe and Canada by Jay A. Erstling, Amy M. Salmela, and Justin N. Woo.</title>
		<link>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1442</link>
		<comments>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1442#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>olajumoke.kassim@wmitchell.edu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3 Issue 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?p=1442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PDF: Usefulness Varies By Country: The Utility Requirement of Patent Law in the United States, Europe and Canada by Jay A. Erstling, Amy M. Salmela, and Justin N. Woo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/52695796?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p>
<p>PDF: <a title="Usefulness Varies By Country: The Utility Requirement of Patent Law in the United States, Europe and Canada" href="http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Erstling-Salmela-Woo.pdf" target="_blank">Usefulness Varies By Country: The Utility Requirement of Patent Law in the United States, Europe and Canada by Jay A. Erstling, Amy M. Salmela, and Justin N. Woo.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1442</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
