William Mitchell’s legal practica and advanced simulation courses immerse students in the areas of general practice, business practice, and advocacy through innovative hands-on learning exercises pioneered by Mitchell faculty and staff. Students gain practical experience in the skills they will put to work as practicing attorneys.
The Legal Practicum: General Practice
The Legal Practicum: General Practice of Law course is designed to provide real-world, hands-on experience in matters involving the general practice of law. Through this course, participants resolve a number of legal issues–negotiating their client’s DWI charge in district court, arguing for or against an attorney’s disciplinary action at the Court of Appeals and conducting a full-day tort trial in front of a mock jury are just a few examples.
Participants receive feedback on their written work and on their oral presentations, allowing them to experiment with different methods and find what works best. In addition, participants apply theory to legal problem solving, address ethical problems, review theory and substance, work cooperatively with others, refresh and improve their writing and lawyering skills, and develop and improve their oral presentation skills.
This course was the hardest, most challenging and exhausting course I have ever taken. I learned more and had more fun than in any other course I have taken in law school. I feel so much more prepared to go out and practice law as a result.
–Spring 2014 Practicum student
- Course Director: Professor John Sonsteng
- Course Administrative Coordinator: Jennifer Miller
- Legal Practicum: General Practice (formerly Legal Practicum) course description
The Advanced Advocacy course is designed to prepare students to be effective advocates.
The primary learning methods are performance, critique, discussion, and video review. The class is divided into small groups, with at least one instructor for each small group of students and two for video classes. When there are two instructors, one instructor conducts a live critique with the student and the other instructor reviews the recorded performance with the student. When no video reviewer is present, the student reviews the video alone. Students prepare written materials, perform oral exercises, and act as witnesses or opposing counsel. Instructors and other members of the small group critique and discuss performances.